Categories
Europe UK

Is your data any good? Six questions to help score your data resources

Simon Oliver (pictured) wonders, in trying to cope with the challenges of Big Data, are we missing the fact that some data feeds just aren’t worth integrating?

Moreover, isn’t focusing on ‘quite Big Data’, identifying the sources that matter and using thin marketing budgets wisely, much more important?Simon Oliver (WEB)

Organisations are in the process of identifying which sources of data, mainly digital, are most useful to them in providing the insight required to drive ROI. There are three main groups that are separated by their ability to handle the complexity of data available to them.

Very few companies are true integrators of systems, processes, content and message. The majority are struggling with the complexity of the systems and skills required to use digital marketing.

Some companies are still uncommitted to this investment and at the experimentation stage, in which true benefit will not be derived due to lack of general integration and effort.

Some organisations have undergone large-scale multi-year data management initiatives to improve integration, only to find that the diversity, incompleteness and rate of change in marketing data sources greatly diminished many intended benefits.

However, not all data integrations are beneficial. Some are not worth the investment required. So, the question for us as database experts is this: Which sources are worth having and can that be proven?

What to ask

The same criteria for assessing a digital or social data feed applies in bringing more traditional data elements into a marketing database. Those can be scored on a largely objective scale, giving us the ability to compare data sources fairly and to set a benchmark for those worthy of inclusion in the central marketing database (CMD).

A typical data scorecard might include the following questions.

1. Is there a unique identifier (such as an email address or phone number) that can be used to match the new data source with the main marketing database?

Score on a range from 0 (exact match possible where that field is populated) to 5 (exact no unique identifier available).

2. Can a unique ID be created using available information?

Score from 0 (yes, easily and with existing resource) to 5 (no).

3. Can a unique ID be created using information not currently available?

Score from 0 (yes, easily and with existing resource) to 5 (only at great cost).

4. How many of the customers and prospects in the CMD (central marketing database) are likely to be found within this feed?

Score from 0 (100% match) to 5 (0% match).

5. Do you have the ability to communicate back to the individuals within the new feed?

Score from 0 (yes, easily and with existing resource) to 5 (only at great cost or no).

6. Assess internally the financial benefit likely to result from integrating the data source.

Score from 0 (10% or greater increase in revenue) to 5 (no measurable increase in revenue).

The total score from 0 to 30 gives an indication of the value the data will bring to the CMD. The lower the score, the lower the cost associated with the data and the higher the ROI likely to result from the integration. A score of 15 or above would indicate that the data has marginal value and careful consideration should take place before valuable budget is spent in this area.

The growing focus on investing in all marketing forms is slicing marketing budgets ever more thinly.

To assess the usefulness and ROI of emerging marketing methods, data is required and it must be integrated into a traditional marketing and analysis platform. There’s the rub: the investment required to do so can be great and the benefits are thus far unmeasured.

Before undertaking any data integration project, each feed must be assessed objectively with stringent criteria, adapted from those described here, to ensure that some ROI will be gained. If you are interested in achieving the best outcome and highest ROI from using your data, get in touch with me at Uncommon Knowledge.

Simon Oliver is the managing director of data insight and data services business, Uncommon Knowledge.

Categories
Uncategorised

INFOGRAPHIC – It’s all about the data!

Infographic-Generic-Details

Categories
Uncategorised

INFOGRAPHIC – It's all about the data!

Infographic-Generic-Details

Categories
UK

Email marketing – not gone and definitely not forgotten!

Simon Lawrence, pictured, shares his view of email marketing as a part of the modern marketing mix.

“With B2B buyers getting 60% of the way through the decision making process before engaging with a business, it is vital to cut through and makeUK-25 contact before you’ve been discounted! Traditionally this was always done via direct mail, with marketers crafting print sales material to be distributed right to the buyer’s desk. However, just when Direct Mail was starting to become more targeted, personalised, and effective the recession hit, and everyone jumped on the email bandwagon. It was cheaper, easier and seemed to have much more potential. With email, businesses could easily set up campaigns which could be distributed to a wide audience for a relatively low cost. People were finding elements of telemarketing rather intrusive, and email seemed to tick all of the boxes for B2B marketers.

Fast forward to now, and can you remember the last time you checked your inbox and there wasn’t any ‘spam’ sales email? And how long each day do you spend deleting emails that don’t interest you? Businesses quickly began bombarding anyone and everyone with countless blanket emails, quickly filling up inboxes all over the country. Permission marketing became ‘carte blanche’ marketing.  As time has passed, the smarter B2B buyerhas struck again and wised up to email spammers. Their resistance to ‘being sold to’ has risen, and their responses to email marketing has changed completely. They aren’t responding to untargeted, irrelevant emails – they want to feel special! But don’t give up yet – although another bandwagon may be approaching, there is still a lot of potential to be had from email marketing (if it is done properly!) The Direct Marketing Association agrees, claiming that email marketing is still capable of achieving significant ROI. It’s important to consider that even though ROI in general for email marketing may have dropped, it is still cheaper and easier than other forms of marketing. And, when considering cost per sale rather than cost per response it is clear how valuable email is as a marketing tool. What’s more, the benefits are crucial, with businesses able to track recipients behaviour, then use that information to construct future activity.

The first obstacle businesses have to face is getting the customer or prospect to open the email in the first place! If they don’t recognise the sender or if they don’t resonate with the subject line, they are unlikely to open the email. And once you’ve been demoted to a junk folder, caught by a spam filter, deleted or they’ve unsubscribed, you’ve lost the battle and no lead had been generated. The proof is in the personalisation – did you know thatpersonalised subject lines are 22.2% more likely to be opened? Responsys reported in 2014 that using customer data to better craft your campaigns can increase open rates by more than 70% and click-through rates by more than 55%. Beyond the subject line, you also need to keep people engaged with your emails through insightful content. Content is the key factor within email marketing, as a prospect engaging with your content can signal the beginning of a relationship.

Content within an email marketing campaign needs to be personalised and targeted. When we think about the process of B2B it is key to consider who is involved in the purchasing decision of the product or service you are marketing. It is incredibly rare that one person would be taking the sole responsibility of making a purchase decision, the DMU (Decision Making Unit) is likely to be made up of people across the organisation. In a smaller business you might be looking at the Managing Director along with a functional head, for example an IT manager. Whereas in a larger business you might be concerned with a functional budget holder (with perhaps various influencers from their functional team), a Financial Director, a Managing Director, a Sales Director and many more. With large businesses it’s also wise to consider who may be able to stop or block purchasing decisions as well as include them!

As you can imagine, all of these people involved in a purchasing decision are likely to all make decisions in different ways. They will have different ideas, concerns and considerations when it comes to spending budget (and probably a list of preferred suppliers too!) In other words, you need to treat each of them as an individual and work towards creating tailored, relevant and targeted messages that are able to cut through and catch each of their attention if you’re to be successful.

But segmentation can go much further – even in B2B, development of a behavioural or values based segmentation can create a much better level of engagement. This will not only provide personalised, relevant content, but also fine tuned imagery and copy treatment. For instance, we know that ‘passionate’ small business leaders are more emotional by nature, and like cool brands and messages about great service – as opposed to the less emotional ‘analytical’  characters who need and want  technical information. Sending technical information to the former and brand information to the latter isn’t likely to get great results.

Email is not a tool to be considered in isolation.  When used properly, email marketing can be incredibly successful, playing a key part in the broader marketing mix – the power to gain access to people’s exact response to your marketing material should not be overlooked either. It’s all about determining how, and at what level, your prospects and customers are ready to be engaged with and how people prefer to do business. In other words, insight.

Simon Lawrence is founder and CEO of Uncommon Knowledge. 

Categories
Uncategorised

Catching the attention of a B2B buyer through enlightened communications

Simon Lawrence (pictured) shares his thoughts about how B2B businesses need to adapt to the changing nature of the B2B buyer.UK-3

“Although the industry has come a long way since the cheesy product spiels and clumsy advertising of the mid-1900s, B2B buyers are still being bombarded every single day by ‘salesy’ calls and badly thought-out marketing communications. Buyers used to be naive, falling for false promises and guarantees, but as we’ve moved into the 21st century, buyers have begun to learn how to avoid these traps and wise up. As we enter 2014, we are faced with an army of B2B buyers who can see right through the majority of sales messages. Quite simply, they just don’t believe what they’re being told anymore.

When we look at decision making, alarmingly, buyers are progressing nearly 60% of the way through this process before they even begin to engage with a sales rep*. This is a concerning figure for businesses as essentially, buyers are qualifying them out before they’re even in!  Decisions are being based more on personal experiences and the buyers own judging criteria, with buyers more likely to choose just a couple of potentials to choose from. This can pose a significant challenge if you’re not being considered by the buyer in the first instance.

In the last year, we’ve started to learn more about  the new modern-day persona of a B2B buyer. The new ‘smart buyer’ wants to just be given the relevant information and then left to sift through it in their own time – they don’t want to talk to anyone while they’re in the process of researching. This is proposing new challenges for marketers as they try to find a way of getting through to and engaging with their target audience. It is becoming commonplace for companies to be fighting through switchboards, dead lines and agitated buyers in order to engage. What’s more, popular communication channels such as social media platforms aren’t providing optimal business engagement opportunities – for example, how many MDs do you think actually take full control of their Twitter accounts? While companies may still be able to generate the occasional piece of new business via these methods, people are generally choosing their own way to be communicated to. It is down to companies to find a way of cutting through the clutter and catching buyers’ attention.

In line with this, we have seen a shift towards a buyer-focused approach, where companies are identifying prospects and attempting to reach them in more valuable ways. If buyers are basing more decisions on experiences, it is key for companies to reach buyers with more salient and meaningful messages that encourages a relationship. This could include sending invitations to communicate so that it stays on the buyer’s terms, and ensuring that communication is based on warm interactions, incentives, relevance and encouragement. Relationships create a personal link between the buyer and the company and, once established, are more difficult for the buyer to step back from. Although buyers will still be sensitive to sales messages, if they’re coming from a company they trust, they are more likely to process information that they’re being sent and tolerate being ‘sold to’ .

To establish this relationship, companies need to work towards creating communication which is capable of interrupting the buyers thoughts and making them listen. In other words, creating communication which addresses their company’s pain points, focuses on areas of interest and reaches them via their preferred method for contact. The better you understand who buys what, when and why, the better informed you are to begin tailoring a message that resonates with them. However, although a lot of companies do collect data like this about their prospects and current customers, they are not able to use it in a way that can inform their marketing efforts. This is usually down to varying factors such as incomplete or inaccurate data, a lack of customer segmentation or the amount of time taken to process data for marketing.

The inability to build a complete profile of buyers leaves companies unsure as to which messages their prospects are most likely to respond to. By bringing data together, company’s can learn exactly which factors are driving business decisions, how buyers want to be contacted and when. This information allows for enlightened communications, where marketing can be targeted to different buyer profiles based on these aforementioned preferences. If companies are able to create content that is first and foremost relevant, as well as interesting and encouraging, they will be able to get better results from much fewer messages giving a greater return on marketing investment.

*Statistic taken from ‘The Digital Evolution in B2B Marketing’ research paper by the Marketing Leadership Council

Simon Lawrence is CEO and founder of data insight and data services business Uncommon Knowledge.